NyseriA wrote:Liam Type-R wrote:But that is the point about it though?
They can sort the insurance part.
But dont want the driving licence or dvla documents. I thought that was the point in them doing it?
So you can't excercise your (god given) right to travel how ever you see fit?
Not trolling, interested in the law and how it works, you read so much about people who claim to know. :salut:
I don't get what you're asking.
I cba watching the videos B21; can you summarise how they lied and what the argument is? The one that cops tend to get wrong is demanding people get out of the car.
You need to have a driving licence and insurance (and MOT) to drive on the road. And a VEL, but that's some other agencies problem.
If you don't have them, God giving you a right to travel won't stand up as a valid defence in court.
Just from a couple of videos i have seen.
People don't contract themselves to 'companies' who make laws, and only use the rights that they have as a human being. Sounds daft i agree, but wondered what the hell they base it on?
Are the laws we a subject to able to be undermined/avoided?
You used the term 'freeman', so wondered if they are actually free men?