- Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:04 pm
#3301652
More of a rant really as I know the probable outcome;
My partner was involved in a three car collision this morning.
She went into the back of some guy that went into the back of a Range Rover - now the difficult part;
GF maintains (I trust her as she isn't a make up in mirror/air head/smoker) she was travelling around 20-5 mph-ish when the car in front suddenly stops and she tries to brake but bumps into the back of him. She gets out of the car and her damage consists of virtually no cosmetic damage to her (ka) bumper - some of the plastic bumper clips have dislodged.
Now the rear bumper of the car she's gone into has literally a single scratch on it.
BUT - the front has stoved in: smashed bumper/grille, dislodged headlight and crumpled bonnet.
The driver of the car she bumped into and the range rover at the front have come to the conclusion that she caused the entire accident.
I don't see how the driver at the very front could have come to such a conclusion of what happened with the 2 cars behind him. So his statement must be invalidated.
What I think is that the car in front of gf whacked into the range rover and then gf has come along and in-turn gone into him as the driver has come to such a sudden stop.
Does GF stand a chance in hell?
GFs car and person she bumped into are also insured by the same company, so don't know if that would affect any outcome?
Her arse:
My partner was involved in a three car collision this morning.
She went into the back of some guy that went into the back of a Range Rover - now the difficult part;
GF maintains (I trust her as she isn't a make up in mirror/air head/smoker) she was travelling around 20-5 mph-ish when the car in front suddenly stops and she tries to brake but bumps into the back of him. She gets out of the car and her damage consists of virtually no cosmetic damage to her (ka) bumper - some of the plastic bumper clips have dislodged.
Now the rear bumper of the car she's gone into has literally a single scratch on it.
BUT - the front has stoved in: smashed bumper/grille, dislodged headlight and crumpled bonnet.
The driver of the car she bumped into and the range rover at the front have come to the conclusion that she caused the entire accident.
I don't see how the driver at the very front could have come to such a conclusion of what happened with the 2 cars behind him. So his statement must be invalidated.
What I think is that the car in front of gf whacked into the range rover and then gf has come along and in-turn gone into him as the driver has come to such a sudden stop.
Does GF stand a chance in hell?
GFs car and person she bumped into are also insured by the same company, so don't know if that would affect any outcome?
Her arse:
Last edited by GenuineSince89 on Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.